Is he the candidate who campaigned on change only to succumb to the Pelosi’s and Barny Frank’s of the Party and go far left. Or, by change, did he mean “fooled ya” I’m really a left radical who wants to change the social fabric of America.

I think that by “change” most Independents and moderates thought he was going to stop the side deals, closed door meetings and try to put an end to the dealings in Washington that have plagued us the past few decades (yes Clinton and Bush(s) included. Instead, we’ve got a guy who blows with the wind based upon what he thinks the populist vote wants to hear while he clandestinely pushes a social agenda that most people don’t want.

Case in point, does anyone really believe the content of his State of the Union address would have been the same regardless of the outcome in MA? No way. He wrote it to placate the Independent populist vote and give the appearance of moving to the center. All of a sudden he is for jobs and deficit reduction! I think not.

The blather you are hearing is not a Tea Party. It’s an educated middle class voter who is scared to death of this guy and his cohorts running up a bill we can’t afford to pay. Yes we do want change. But it’s not the change Obama is trying to bring.